Up to 50% + More! Up to 50% Everything + More! Code: JANFAVS Ends: 1/20 Details

  1. Help
Up to 50% + More! Up to 50% Everything + More! Code: JANFAVS Ends: 1/20 Details

Blank Canvas

Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.

Blank Canvas - Page Text Content

FC: Jenny Davis

1: intro: | "we kill people to show people that killing is wrong" that doesnt sound right does it? well thats what people do they basicly get revenge on the people who killed others. in my openion i dont think thats right i am agianst the death penalty.

2: reasons | the death penalty breaks the ninth amendment. | -"it upholds the right to life for all to the maximum extent that is consistent with a persons own free choices" | it might kill innocent people | fingerprints may have been destroyed in the crime and might have a innocent person being proved guilty | may not have alot of information and just put a innocent person the death penalty | killing is cruel and unusual punishment

3: "counterterrorism legislation is a dangerous expansion of governmental powers" (rosen, jeffrey) | government has to much power | its wrong to choose the death of others | everyone diserves a second chance

4: pros | cons | capital punishment celebrates the dignity of the humans whose lives were ended by the afendants predation | it is difficult to have a serious criminal justice system without a death penalty | people may not be guilty | makes all of us killers for killing others as revenge | breaks the ninth amendment

5: pictures | injections | electric chair

6: gas chamber | hanging | b-headed

8: works cited | Aronson,jay d; and simon a.cole "science and death penalty: DNA, innocence,anddebate over capital punishment in the united states". law of social inquiry 34.3 (2009): 603-633. academic search premier EBSCO. web. 23 may 2011. | house,ron. "the death penalty and the principle of goodness. "international journal of human rights 13.5 (2009): 680-688. academic search premiel. EBSCO. web. 19 may 2011. | Rosen, Jeffrey. "counterterrorism legislation is a dangerous expansion of governmental powers" rerrorism. Ed. laura K. Egendorf Sandiego: greenhaven press, 2000, opposing view points. Galeopposing viewpoints in context. Web. 20 may 2011. | Thornburge nathan. Resumed innocent" time. 175. 21 (2010): 26-31 Accdemic search primier. EBSCO. web. 20 may 2011.

9: continued | citiizen united for alternatives to death penalty. "life imprisonment is preferable to the death penalty." 2004. Rpt. in capital punishment. Ed. mary E. williams. san diego:greenhaven press, 2005. current controversies. gale opposing viewpoints in context. web. 23 may 2011.

Sizes: mini|medium|large|massive
Default User
  • By: phillip t.
  • Joined: over 8 years ago
  • Published Mixbooks: 1
No contributors

About This Mixbook

  • Title: Blank Canvas
  • Theme for Mixbook Scrapbookers
  • Tags: None
  • Published: over 8 years ago